| Title |
Development and GBS-genotyping of introgression lines (ILs) using two wild species of rice, O. meridionalis and O. rufipogon, in a common recurrent parent, O. sativa cv. Curinga
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Breeding, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11032-015-0276-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan D. Arbelaez, Laura T. Moreno, Namrata Singh, Chih-Wei Tung, Lyza G. Maron, Yolima Ospina, César P. Martinez, Cécile Grenier, Mathias Lorieux, Susan McCouch |
| Abstract |
Two populations of interspecific introgression lines (ILs) in a common recurrent parent were developed for use in pre-breeding and QTL mapping. The ILs were derived from crosses between cv Curinga, a tropical japonica upland cultivar, and two different wild donors, Oryza meridionalis Ng. accession (W2112) and Oryza rufipogon Griff. accession (IRGC 105491). The lines were genotyped using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and SSRs. The 32 Curinga/O. meridionalis ILs contain 76.73 % of the donor genome in individual introgressed segments, and each line has an average of 94.9 % recurrent parent genome. The 48 Curinga/O. rufipogon ILs collectively contain 97.6 % of the donor genome with an average of 89.9 % recurrent parent genome per line. To confirm that these populations were segregating for traits of interest, they were phenotyped for pericarp color in the greenhouse and for four agronomic traits-days to flowering, plant height, number of tillers, and number of panicles-in an upland field environment. Seeds from these IL libraries and the accompanying GBS datasets are publicly available and represent valuable genetic resources for exploring the genetics and breeding potential of rice wild relatives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Comoros | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Benin | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 27% |
| Researcher | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,143,833
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Breeding
#131
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,649
of 359,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Breeding
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.