↓ Skip to main content

High-resolution leaf-fossil record spanning the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-resolution leaf-fossil record spanning the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary
Published in
Nature, August 1989
DOI 10.1038/340708a0
Authors

Kirk R. Johnson, Douglas J. Nichols, Moses Attrep, Charles J. Orth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 50%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,813,027
of 25,246,334 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#66,165
of 97,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,668
of 13,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#65
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,246,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.