↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial Functioning following Bariatric Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial Functioning following Bariatric Surgery
Published in
Obesity Surgery, June 2006
DOI 10.1381/096089206777346808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerbrand C M van Hout, Petra Boekestein, Frederiek A M Fortuin, Aline J M Pelle, Guus L van Heck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 35 30%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2015.
All research outputs
#21,014,890
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,874
of 3,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,538
of 87,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.