↓ Skip to main content

Summary of the proceedings of the International Forum 2017: “Position of interventional radiology within radiology”

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Summary of the proceedings of the International Forum 2017: “Position of interventional radiology within radiology”
Published in
Insights into Imaging, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13244-018-0594-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Abstract

The International Forum is held once a year by the ESR and its international radiological partner societies with the aim to address and discuss selected topics of global relevance in radiology. In 2017, the issue of the position of interventional radiology (IR) within radiology was analysed. IR is expanding because of the increased patient demand for minimally invasive therapies performed under imaging guidance, and its success in improving patient outcomes, reducing in-hospital stays, reducing morbidity and mortality of treatment in many organs and organ-systems. Despite the many successes of IR, public awareness about it is quite low. IR requires specific training and, in most countries, the majority of interventional radiologists do not dedicate their time completely to IR but perform diagnostic radiology investigations as well. Turf battles in IR are common in many countries. To preserve and keep IR within radiology, it is necessary to focus more on direct and longitudinal patient care. Having beds dedicated to IR within radiology departments is very important to increase clinical involvement of interventional radiologists. IR procedures fit perfectly within "value-based healthcare", but the metrics have to be developed. • IR should stay a prominent subspecialty within radiology. • Dedicated IR training pathways are mandatory. • Measures to increase recruitment of young doctors to IR and to increase public awareness of IR are needed. • Beds dedicated to IR within radiology departments are important in order to increase clinical involvement of interventional radiologists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 22%
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 28%
Engineering 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,816,655
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#287
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,264
of 333,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.