You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
IFPA meeting 2014 workshop report: Animal models to study pregnancy pathologies; new approaches to study human placental exposure to xenobiotics; biomarkers of pregnancy pathologies; placental genetics and epigenetics; the placenta and stillbirth and fetal growth restriction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Placenta, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.01.196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Barbaux, J.J.H.M. Erwich, P.O. Favaron, S. Gil, D. Gallot, T.G. Golos, A. Gonzalez-Bulnes, J. Guibourdenche, A.E.P. Heazell, T. Jansson, O. Laprévote, R.M. Lewis, R.K. Miller, D. Monk, B. Novakovic, C. Oudejans, M. Parast, P. Peugnet, C. Pfarrer, H. Pinar, C.T. Roberts, W. Robinson, R. Saffery, C. Salomon, A. Sexton, A.C. Staff, M. Suter, A. Tarrade, J. Wallace, C. Vaillancourt, D. Vaiman, S.A. Worton, G.E. Lash |
| Abstract |
Workshops are an important part of the IFPA annual meeting as they allow for discussion of specialized topics. At IFPA meeting 2014 there were six themed workshops, five of which are summarized in this report. These workshops related to various aspects of placental biology but collectively covered areas of animal models, xenobiotics, pathological biomarkers, genetics and epigenetics, and stillbirth and fetal growth restriction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Placenta
#1,288
of 2,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,136
of 367,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Placenta
#29
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.