Title |
Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in Orthopaedics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sameer Badarudeen, Sanjeev Sabharwal |
Abstract |
Health literacy is the single best predictor of an individual's health status. It is important to customize health-related education material to the individual patient's level of reading skills. Readability of a given text is the objective measurement of the reading skills one should possess to understand the written material. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 410 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 73 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
Researcher | 39 | 9% |
Other | 99 | 24% |
Unknown | 68 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 30 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 5% |
Other | 70 | 17% |
Unknown | 94 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,958,516
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#252
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,039
of 108,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.