↓ Skip to main content

Limitations of the Trail Making Test Part-B in Assessing Frontal Executive Dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limitations of the Trail Making Test Part-B in Assessing Frontal Executive Dysfunction
Published in
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, February 2015
DOI 10.1017/s135561771500003x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edgar Chan, Sarah E. MacPherson, Gail Robinson, Martha Turner, Francesca Lecce, Tim Shallice, Lisa Cipolotti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 38%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,989,004
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
#863
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,130
of 269,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.