You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association study identifies peanut allergy-specific loci and evidence of epigenetic mediation in US children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms7304 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiumei Hong, Ke Hao, Christine Ladd-Acosta, Kasper D. Hansen, Hui-Ju Tsai, Xin Liu, Xin Xu, Timothy A. Thornton, Deanna Caruso, Corinne A. Keet, Yifei Sun, Guoying Wang, Wei Luo, Rajesh Kumar, Ramsay Fuleihan, Anne Marie Singh, Jennifer S. Kim, Rachel E. Story, Ruchi S. Gupta, Peisong Gao, Zhu Chen, Sheila O. Walker, Tami R. Bartell, Terri H. Beaty, M. Daniele Fallin, Robert Schleimer, Patrick G. Holt, Kari Christine Nadeau, Robert A. Wood, Jacqueline A. Pongracic, Daniel E. Weeks, Xiaobin Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 28% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 67% |
| Scientists | 15 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 88 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2023.
All research outputs
#296,947
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,408
of 58,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,309
of 270,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#33
of 753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.