↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Fluoride on DNA Damage and Caspase-Mediated Apoptosis in the Liver of Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Fluoride on DNA Damage and Caspase-Mediated Apoptosis in the Liver of Rats
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12011-015-0265-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guo Hua Song, Fu Bing Huang, Ji Ping Gao, Mao Lin Liu, Wen Biao Pang, Wei bin Li, Xiao Yan Yan, Mei Jun Huo, Xia Yang

Abstract

Fluoride compounds are abundant and widely distributed in the environment at a variety of concentrations. Further, fluoride induces toxic effects in target organs such as the liver. In this study, we investigated liver histopathology, DNA damage, apoptosis, and the mRNA and protein expressions of caspase-3 and -9 in the rat livers by administering varying concentrations of fluoride (0, 50, 100, 200 mg/L ) for 120 days. The results showed fluoride-induced morphological changes and significantly increased apoptosis and DNA damage in rats exposed to fluoride, especially in response to higher doses. The immunohistochemical and qRT-PCR results indicated that caspase-3, caspase-9 protein positive expression and mRNA relative expression enhanced with increasing NaF concentration. In summary, our findings suggest that chronic exposure to fluoride causes damages to liver histopathology and leads to liver apoptosis through caspase-mediated pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Chemistry 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,354,251
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#926
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,442
of 254,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.