↓ Skip to main content

Age- and Sex-Specific Causal Effects of Adiposity on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age- and Sex-Specific Causal Effects of Adiposity on Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Published in
Diabetes, February 2015
DOI 10.2337/db14-0988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tove Fall, Sara Hägg, Alexander Ploner, Reedik Mägi, Krista Fischer, Harmen H.M. Draisma, Antti-Pekka Sarin, Beben Benyamin, Claes Ladenvall, Mikael Åkerlund, Mart Kals, Tõnu Esko, Christopher P. Nelson, Marika Kaakinen, Ville Huikari, Massimo Mangino, Aline Meirhaeghe, Kati Kristiansson, Marja-Liisa Nuotio, Michael Kobl, Harald Grallert, Abbas Dehghan, Maris Kuningas, Paul S. de Vries, Renée F.A.G. de Bruijn, Sara M. Willems, Kauko Heikkilä, Karri Silventoinen, Kirsi H. Pietiläinen, Vanessa Legry, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Louisa Goumidi, Ann-Christine Syvänen, Konstantin Strauch, Wolfgang Koenig, Peter Lichtner, Christian Herder, Aarno Palotie, Cristina Menni, André G. Uitterlinden, Kari Kuulasmaa, Aki S. Havulinna, Luis A. Moreno, Marcela Gonzalez-Gross, Alun Evans, David-Alexandre Tregouet, John W.G. Yarnell, Jarmo Virtamo, Jean Ferrières, Giovanni Veronesi, Markus Perola, Dominique Arveiler, Paolo Brambilla, Lars Lind, Jaakko Kaprio, Albert Hofman, Bruno H. Stricker, Cornelia M. van Duijn, M. Arfan Ikram, Oscar H. Franco, Dominique Cottel, Jean Dallongeville, Alistair S. Hall, Antti Jula, Martin D. Tobin, Brenda W. Penninx, Annette Peters, Christian Gieger, Nilesh J. Samani, Grant W. Montgomery, John B. Whitfield, Nicholas G. Martin, Leif Groop, Tim D. Spector, Patrik K. Magnusson, Philippe Amouyel, Dorret I. Boomsma, Peter M. Nilsson, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Valeriya Lyssenko, Andres Metspalu, David P. Strachan, Veikko Salomaa, Samuli Ripatti, Nancy L. Pedersen, Inga Prokopenko, Mark I. McCarthy, Erik Ingelsson

Abstract

Observational studies have reported different effects of adiposity on cardiovascular risk factors across age and sex. Since cardiovascular risk factors are enriched in obese individuals, it has not been easy to dissect the effects of adiposity from those of other risk factors. We used a Mendelian randomization approach, applying a set of 32 genetic markers to estimate the causal effect of adiposity on blood pressure, glycemic indices, circulating lipid levels, and markers of inflammation and liver disease in up to 67,553 individuals. All analyses were stratified by age (cutoff 55 years of age) and sex. The genetic score was associated with BMI in both nonstratified analysis (P = 2.8 × 10(-107)) and stratified analyses (all P < 3.3 × 10(-30)). We found evidence of a causal effect of adiposity on blood pressure, fasting levels of insulin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides in a nonstratified analysis and in the <55-year stratum. Further, we found evidence of a smaller causal effect on total cholesterol (P for difference = 0.015) in the ≥55-year stratum than in the <55-year stratum, a finding that could be explained by biology, survival bias, or differential medication. In conclusion, this study extends previous knowledge of the effects of adiposity by providing sex- and age-specific causal estimates on cardiovascular risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Psychology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 48 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,700,675
of 24,792,414 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#703
of 9,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,081
of 260,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#18
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,792,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.