| Title |
Specific MAIT cell behaviour among innate-like T lymphocytes in critically ill patients with severe infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-3163-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Grimaldi, Lionel Le Bourhis, Bertrand Sauneuf, Agnès Dechartres, Christophe Rousseau, Fatah Ouaaz, Maud Milder, Delphine Louis, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Jean-Paul Mira, Olivier Lantz, Frédéric Pène |
| Abstract |
In between innate and adaptive immunity, the recently identified innate-like mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) lymphocytes display specific reactivity to non-streptococcal bacteria. Whether they are involved in bacterial sepsis has not been investigated. We aimed to assess the number and the time course of circulating innate-like T lymphocytes (MAIT, NKT and γδ T cells) in critically ill septic and non-septic patients and to establish correlations with the further development of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 30% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,173,115
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,777
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,092
of 306,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.