↓ Skip to main content

Astaxanthin prevents in vitro auto-oxidative injury in human lymphocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biology and Toxicology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Astaxanthin prevents in vitro auto-oxidative injury in human lymphocytes
Published in
Cell Biology and Toxicology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10565-010-9156-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anaysa P. Bolin, Rita C. Macedo, Douglas P. Marin, Marcelo P. Barros, Rosemari Otton

Abstract

Upon mitogen sensitization, lymphocytes undergo proliferation by oxyradical-based mechanisms. Through continuous resting-restimulation cycles, lymphocytes accumulate auto-induced oxidative lesions which lead to cell dysfunction and limit their viability. Astaxanthin (ASTA) is a nutritional carotenoid that shows notable antioxidant properties. This study aims to evaluate whether the in vitro ASTA treatment can limit oxyradical production and auto-oxidative injury in human lymphocytes. Activated lymphocytes treated with 5 microM ASTA showed immediate lower rates of O(2)(*-) /H(2)O(2) production whilst NO* and intracellular Ca(2+) levels were concomitantly enhanced (<or=4 h). In long-term treatments (>24 h), the cytotoxicity test for ASTA showed a sigmoidal dose-response curve (LC50 = 11.67 +/- 0.42 microM), whereas higher activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase in 5 microM ASTA-treated lymphocytes were associated to significant lower indexes of oxidative injury. On the other hand, lower proliferative scores of ASTA lymphocytes might be a result of diminished intracellular levels of pivotal redox signaling molecules, such as H(2)O(2). Further studies are necessary to establish the ASTA-dose compensation point between minimizing oxidative damages and allowing efficient redox-mediated immune functions, such as proliferation, adhesion, and oxidative burst.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,176
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#366
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,001
of 94,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.