↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of systemic inflammation to chronic neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
Title
Contribution of systemic inflammation to chronic neurodegeneration
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00401-010-0722-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Hugh Perry

Abstract

Systemic infection or inflammation gives rise to signals that communicate with the brain and leads to changes in metabolism and behaviour collectively known as sickness behaviour. In healthy young individuals, these changes are normally transient with no long-term consequences. The microglia are involved in the immune to brain signalling pathways. In the aged or diseased brain, the microglia have a primed phenotype as a consequence of changes in their local microenvironment. Systemic inflammation impacts on these primed microglia and switches them from a relatively benign to an aggressive phenotype with the enhanced synthesis of pro-inflammatory mediators. Recent evidence suggests that systemic inflammation contributes to the exacerbation of acute symptoms of chronic neurodegenerative disease and may accelerate disease progression. The normal homeostatic role that microglia play in signalling about systemic infections and inflammation becomes maladaptive in the aged and diseased brain and this offers a route to therapeutic intervention. Prompt treatment of systemic inflammation or blockade of signalling pathways from the periphery to the brain may help to slow neurodegeneration and improve the quality of life for individuals suffering from chronic neurodegenerative disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Luxembourg 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 259 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 21%
Researcher 45 17%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Other 11 4%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 46 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 17%
Neuroscience 44 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 8%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 58 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,701,288
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#905
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,503
of 94,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.