| Title |
Higher Frequency of Anastomotic Leakage with Stapled Compared to Hand‐Sewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in a Large Population‐Based Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-015-2996-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pontus Gustafsson, Pia Jestin, Ulf Gunnarsson, Ulrik Lindforss |
| Abstract |
The stapling technique was recommended in a recent Cochrane analysis based on relatively small randomized trials between 1970 and 2009. Data from a large Swedish population-based quality register were analyzed in order to compare the leakage frequency between stapled and hand-sewn ileocolic anastomoses in colon cancer surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 56% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#13,734,646
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#2,649
of 4,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,854
of 255,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#20
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.