| Title |
A comparison of mechanisms of desiccation tolerance among three angiosperm resurrection plant species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Ecology, November 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026534305831 |
| Authors |
Jill M. Farrant |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#281
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,531
of 41,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.