You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Between the Baltic and Danubian Worlds: The Genetic Affinities of a Middle Neolithic Population from Central Poland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0118316 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wiesław Lorkiewicz, Tomasz Płoszaj, Krystyna Jędrychowska-Dańska, Elżbieta Żądzińska, Dominik Strapagiel, Elżbieta Haduch, Anita Szczepanek, Ryszard Grygiel, Henryk W. Witas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 24% |
| Arts and Humanities | 11 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,785,595
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,112
of 216,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,064
of 260,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#434
of 4,828 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,828 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.