↓ Skip to main content

Novel Relationships Among Ten Fish Model Species Revealed Based on a Phylogenomic Analysis Using ESTs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Novel Relationships Among Ten Fish Model Species Revealed Based on a Phylogenomic Analysis Using ESTs
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00239-005-0170-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Steinke, Walter Salzburger, Axel Meyer

Abstract

The power of comparative phylogenomic analyses also depends on the amount of data that are included in such studies. We used expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from fish model species as a proof of principle approach in order to test the reliability of using ESTs for phylogenetic inference. As expected, the robustness increases with the amount of sequences. Although some progress has been made in the elucidation of the phylogeny of teleosts, relationships among the main lineages of the derived fish (Euteleostei) remain poorly defined and are still debated. We performed a phylogenomic analysis of a set of 42 of orthologous genes from 10 available fish model systems from seven different orders (Salmoniformes, Siluriformes, Cypriniformes, Tetraodontiformes, Cyprinodontiformes, Beloniformes, and Perciformes) of euteleostean fish to estimate divergence times and evolutionary relationships among those lineages. All 10 fish species serve as models for developmental, aquaculture, genomic, and comparative genetic studies. The phylogenetic signal and the strength of the contribution of each of the 42 orthologous genes were estimated with randomly chosen data subsets. Our study revealed a molecular phylogeny of higher-level relationships of derived teleosts, which indicates that the use of multiple genes produces robust phylogenies, a finding that is expected to apply to other phylogenetic issues among distantly related taxa. Our phylogenomic analyses confirm that the euteleostean superorders Ostariophysi and Acanthopterygii are monophyletic and the Protacanthopterygii and Ostariophysi are sister clades. In addition, and contrary to the traditional phylogenetic hypothesis, our analyses determine that killifish (Cyprinodontiformes), medaka (Beloniformes), and cichlids (Perciformes) appear to be more closely related to each other than either of them is to pufferfish (Tetraodontiformes). All 10 lineages split before or during the fragmentation of the supercontinent Pangea in the Jurassic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Germany 3 2%
France 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 118 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 23%
Student > Master 16 11%
Professor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 6 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Unspecified 2 1%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 12 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#5,872,539
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#358
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,481
of 66,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.