↓ Skip to main content

Do reductions in out-of-pocket expenses for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans translate to reduced fracture incidence amongst older Australians? A population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Osteoporosis, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Do reductions in out-of-pocket expenses for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans translate to reduced fracture incidence amongst older Australians? A population-based study
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11657-018-0449-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda L. Stuart, Sharon L. Brennan-Olsen, Julie A. Pasco, Amelia G. Betson, Kara L. Holloway-Kew, Sarah M. Hosking, Lana J. Williams

Abstract

This study aimed to compare fracture incidence in the elderly pre- and post-revision of bone density scan reimbursement guidelines, which changed in 2007. Fracture incidence by age group was calculated using population-specific data. Guideline changes did not appear to reduce fracture incidence in the study region located in south-eastern Australia. In 2007, Medicare Australia revised reimbursement guidelines whereby individuals aged 70 years and over received reduced out-of-pocket expenses for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. The current study aims to determine whether fracture incidence in the elderly has changed since the revision of reimbursement guidelines. Keyword searches of the two major radiological centres servicing the Barwon Statistical Division (BSD) were used to identify incident fractures for residents aged 75 years and over for 2006 and 2012. Pathological fractures were excluded. Fracture incidence by age strata (75-79 years, 80-84 years and 85+ years) were calculated using population-specific data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006 and 2012). Standardised fracture ratios were calculated for men and women. In total, 996 fracture events were identified for BSD residents during 2006 and 1260 identified in 2012. The standardised fracture ratios between 2006 and 2012 were 1.12 (95%CI 1.11, 1.25) for men and 1.08 (95%CI 1.11, 1.16) for women. The change in reimbursement guidelines appears to have had little impact on reducing fracture incidence during this time frame for elderly men and women, in fact, fracture rates increased. Future research should investigate osteoporosis management following DXA over a longer time frame.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,340,087
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Osteoporosis
#113
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,833
of 328,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Osteoporosis
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.