↓ Skip to main content

A Guide to the Use of Anticoagulant Drugs in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Drugs, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 584)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
A Guide to the Use of Anticoagulant Drugs in Children
Published in
Pediatric Drugs, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40272-015-0120-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Connie Law, Leslie Raffini

Abstract

Increasing thrombotic complications in children with complex medication conditions have led to more widespread use of anticoagulants [Raffini et al. in Pediatrics 124(4):1001-8, 2009]. While current guidelines for the management of antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children exist, they are based on low- and very low-quality evidence [Monagle et al. in Chest 141(2 Suppl):e737-801S, 2012]. Despite numerous differences, current anticoagulation practice is largely extrapolated from adult studies. This is sub-optimal, particularly in neonates who have a rapidly evolving hemostatic system. The majority of pediatric patients have underlying medical conditions that may significantly influence drug choice and bleeding risk. This article reviews the use of anticoagulants in children with thrombosis, focusing on practical aspects such as dosing, monitoring, and complications. Low molecular weight heparin has become the preferred anticoagulant in children, although unfractionated heparin and warfarin remain frequently used. Other anticoagulants, including fondaparinux, direct thrombin inhibitors, and the newer target-specific oral anticoagulants are also discussed. Given the many unique challenges surrounding the use of anticoagulants in children, pediatric hospitals should have written practice guidelines as well as experienced providers to care for children with thrombosis. This is an evolving field, and further studies of the use of anticoagulants in neonates and children are greatly needed to help optimize care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 17%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,864,775
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Drugs
#46
of 584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,698
of 270,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Drugs
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.