| Title |
Evaluation of an Implementation Model: A National Investigation of VA Residential Programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-014-0555-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan M. Cook, Stephanie Dinnen, James C. Coyne, Richard Thompson, Vanessa Simiola, Josef Ruzek, Paula P. Schnurr |
| Abstract |
This national investigation utilizes qualitative data to evaluate an implementation model regarding factors influencing provider use of two evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 198 mental health providers from 38 Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) residential treatment programs were used to explore these issues regarding prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in VA residential PTSD programs. Several unique and some overlapping predictors emerged. Leadership was viewed as an influence on implementation for both CPT and PE, while a lack of dedicated time and resources was viewed as a deterrent for both. Compatibility of CPT with providers' existing practices and beliefs, the ability to observe noticeable patient improvement, a perceived relative advantage of CPT over alternative treatments, and the presence of a supportive peer network emerged as influential on CPT implementation. Leadership was associated with PE implementation. Implications for the design and improvement of training and implementation efforts are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,612,765
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#89
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,242
of 242,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.