↓ Skip to main content

Histone H2A and H4 N-terminal Tails Are Positioned by the MEP50 WD Repeat Protein for Efficient Methylation by the PRMT5 Arginine Methyltransferase*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histone H2A and H4 N-terminal Tails Are Positioned by the MEP50 WD Repeat Protein for Efficient Methylation by the PRMT5 Arginine Methyltransferase*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, February 2015
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m115.636894
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel S Burgos, Carola Wilczek, Takashi Onikubo, Jeffrey B Bonanno, Janina Jansong, Ulf Reimer, David Shechter

Abstract

The protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 is complexed with the WD-repeat protein MEP50 (also known as Wdr77 or androgen coactivator p44) in vertebrates in a tetramer of heterodimers. MEP50 is hypothesized to be required for protein substrate recruitment to the catalytic domain of PRMT5. Here we demonstrate that the cross-dimer MEP50 is paired with its cognate PRMT5 molecule to promote histone methylation. We employed qualitative methylation assays and a novel ultrasensitive continuous assay to measure enzyme kinetics. We demonstrate that neither full-length human PRMT5 nor the Xenopus laevis PRMT5 catalytic domain have appreciable protein methyltransferase activity. We show that histones H4 and H3 bind PRMT5-MEP50 more efficiently compared to histone H2A(1-20) and H4(1-20) peptides. Histone binding is mediated through histone fold interactions as determined by competition experiments and by high density histone peptide array interaction studies. Nucleosomes are not a substrate for PRMT5-MEP50, consistent with the primary mode of interaction via the histone fold of H3/H4, obscured by DNA in the nucleosome. Mutation of a conserved arginine (R42) on the MEP50 insertion loop impaired the PRMT5-MEP50 enzymatic efficiency by increasing its histone substrate Km, comparable to that of Caenorhabditis elegans PRMT5. We show that PRMT5-MEP50 prefers unmethylated substrates, consistent with a distributive model for dimethylation and suggesting discrete biological roles for mono- and dimethylarginine modified proteins. We propose a model in which MEP50 and PRMT5 simultaneously engage the protein substrate, orienting its targeted arginine to the catalytic site.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 32%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 28%
Chemistry 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,572,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#11,959
of 85,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,835
of 269,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#64
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.