| Title |
The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13428-015-0563-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leendert van Maanen, Birte U. Forstmann, Max C. Keuken, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Andrew Heathcote |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Norway | 1 | 9% |
| Denmark | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,428,305
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#736
of 2,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,299
of 269,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.