You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrophysiological and spinal imaging evidences for sensory dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007659 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline Iglesias, Sina Sangari, Mohamed-Mounir El Mendili, Habib Benali, Véronique Marchand-Pauvert, Pierre-François Pradat |
| Abstract |
The prevalence of sensory impairment at an early stage of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is still debated. The study aim was to investigate the anatomofunctional properties of sensory pathways in patients with ALS, combining spinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,195,543
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#13,945
of 22,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,276
of 255,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#155
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.