↓ Skip to main content

Does working memory training have to be adaptive?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Does working memory training have to be adaptive?
Published in
Psychological Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00426-015-0655-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia C. von Bastian, Anne Eschen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 28%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 78 53%
Neuroscience 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,724,645
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#173
of 1,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,499
of 270,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.