↓ Skip to main content

Changes in three dimensional lumbo-pelvic kinematics and trunk muscle activity with speed and mode of locomotion

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biomechanics, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in three dimensional lumbo-pelvic kinematics and trunk muscle activity with speed and mode of locomotion
Published in
Clinical Biomechanics, October 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.04.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven W. Saunders, Anthony Schache, David Rath, Paul W. Hodges

Abstract

Control of the trunk is critical for locomotor efficiency. However, investigations of trunk muscle activity and three-dimensional lumbo-pelvic kinematics during walking and running remain scarce.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 19%
Student > Master 38 15%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 20 8%
Other 56 22%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 22%
Sports and Recreations 55 21%
Engineering 29 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 64 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#1,719
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,296
of 70,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.