↓ Skip to main content

An Interactive Narrative Format for Clinical Guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
An Interactive Narrative Format for Clinical Guidelines
Published in
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13218-015-0354-3
Authors

Marc Cavazza, Fred Charles, Alan Lindsay, Jonathan Siddle, Gersende Georg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Design 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,956
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
#103
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,002
of 254,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.