| Title |
The treatment of lymphedema related to breast cancer: a systematic review and evidence summary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-004-0627-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lyn Kligman, Rebecca K. S. Wong, Mary Johnston, Nancy S. Laetsch, Members of the Supportive Care Guidelines Group of Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-based Care |
| Abstract |
To provide an evidence summary report on the question: What are the treatment options for women with lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 27% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,561,561
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#762
of 5,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,113
of 62,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.