↓ Skip to main content

A meta-database of Holocene sediment cores for England

Overview of attention for article published in Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A meta-database of Holocene sediment cores for England
Published in
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00334-015-0515-1
Authors

Andrew J. Suggitt, Richard T. Jones, Chris J. Caseldine, Brian Huntley, John R. Stewart, Stephen J. Brooks, Eleanor Brown, David Fletcher, Phillipa K. Gillingham, Jonathan Larwood, Nicholas A. Macgregor, Barbara Silva, Zoë Thomas, Robert J. Wilson, Ilya M. D. Maclean

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 42%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,532,208
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#273
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,927
of 357,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.