↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among young Mexican women with triple-negative breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among young Mexican women with triple-negative breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10549-015-3312-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Villarreal-Garza, J. N. Weitzel, M. Llacuachaqui, E. Sifuentes, M. C. Magallanes-Hoyos, L. Gallardo, R. M. Alvarez-Gómez, J. Herzog, D. Castillo, R. Royer, Mohammad Akbari, F. Lara-Medina, L. A. Herrera, A. Mohar, S. A. Narod

Abstract

Various guidelines recommend that women with triple-negative breast cancer should be tested for BRCA1 mutations, but the prevalence of mutations may vary with ethnic group and with geographic region, and the optimal cutoff age for testing has not been established. We estimated the frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations among 190 women with triple-negative breast cancer, unselected for family history, diagnosed at age 50 or less at a single hospital in Mexico City. Patients were screened for 115 recurrent BRCA mutations, which have been reported previously in women of Hispanic origin, including a common large rearrangement Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del). A BRCA mutation was detected in 44 of 190 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (23 %). Forty-three mutations were found in BRCA1 and one mutation was found in BRCA2. Seven different mutations accounted for 39 patients (89 % of the total mutations). The Mexican founder mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del) was found 18 times and accounted for 41 % of all mutations detected. There is a high prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young triple-negative breast cancer patients in Mexico. Women with triple-negative breast cancer in Mexico should be screened for mutations in BRCA1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,331,319
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,385
of 4,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,187
of 255,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#16
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.