↓ Skip to main content

A revolution without people? Closing the people–policy gap in aquaculture development

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Fish Diseases, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A revolution without people? Closing the people–policy gap in aquaculture development
Published in
Annual Review of Fish Diseases, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.02.009
Authors

Gesche Krause, Cecile Brugere, Amy Diedrich, Michael W. Ebeling, Sebastian C.A. Ferse, Eirik Mikkelsen, José A. Pérez Agúndez, Selina M. Stead, Nardine Stybel, Max Troell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 356 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 17%
Researcher 55 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 69 19%
Unknown 70 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 28%
Environmental Science 79 21%
Social Sciences 36 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 4%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 79 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,480,903
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Fish Diseases
#134
of 5,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,143
of 287,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Fish Diseases
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.