↓ Skip to main content

Reflections on stability technology for reducing risk of system collapse due to cascading outages

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Reflections on stability technology for reducing risk of system collapse due to cascading outages
Published in
Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40565-014-0067-x
Authors

Yongjie Fang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 46%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 77%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
#75
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,966
of 239,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.