| Title |
Withholding or withdrawing therapy in intensive care units: an analysis of collaboration among healthcare professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2345-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanne Irene Jensen, Jette Ammentorp, Mogens Erlandsen, Helle Ørding |
| Abstract |
The purpose of the study was to determine the views of intensive care nurses, intensivists, and primary physicians regarding collaboration and other aspects of withholding and withdrawing therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 27% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#6,906,939
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,724
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,490
of 124,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.