| Title |
Letter in response to Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Technology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12553-018-0228-4 |
| Authors |
Dominic King, Alan Karthikesalingam, Cían Hughes, Hugh Montgomery, Rosalind Raine, Geraint Rees, On behalf of the DeepMind Health Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 44 | 31% |
| United States | 13 | 9% |
| Australia | 11 | 8% |
| Belgium | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 68% |
| Scientists | 33 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#459,668
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Health and Technology
#7
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,303
of 344,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Technology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.