↓ Skip to main content

Inequity to the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 3,695)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Inequity to the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Obesity Surgery, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11695-015-1595-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjit K. Bhogal, Jacinta I. Reddigan, Ori D. Rotstein, Ashley Cohen, Dresden Glockler, Andrea C. Tricco, Janet K. Smylie, Stephen A. Glazer, Jason Pennington, Lesley Gotlib Conn, Timothy D. Jackson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Social Sciences 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#566,966
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#39
of 3,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,774
of 263,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#1
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.