↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of admissible runoff withdrawals in small river basins: Methodological principles

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of admissible runoff withdrawals in small river basins: Methodological principles
Published in
Water Resources, March 2006
DOI 10.1134/s0097807806020096
Authors

V. I. Danilov-Danil’yan, M. V. Bolgov, V. G. Dubinina, V. S. Kovalevskii, A. G. Kocharyan, N. M. Novikova

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,875,773
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources
#11
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,056
of 71,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them