↓ Skip to main content

Exome sequencing unravels unexpected differential diagnoses in individuals with the tentative diagnosis of Coffin–Siris and Nicolaides–Baraitser syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exome sequencing unravels unexpected differential diagnoses in individuals with the tentative diagnosis of Coffin–Siris and Nicolaides–Baraitser syndromes
Published in
Human Genetics, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00439-015-1535-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuria C. Bramswig, Hermann-Josef Lüdecke, Yasemin Alanay, Beate Albrecht, Alexander Barthelmie, Koray Boduroglu, Diana Braunholz, Almuth Caliebe, Krystyna H. Chrzanowska, Johanna Christina Czeschik, Sabine Endele, Elisabeth Graf, Encarna Guillén-Navarro, Pelin Özlem Simsek Kiper, Vanesa López-González, Ilaria Parenti, Jelena Pozojevic, Gulen Eda Utine, Thomas Wieland, Frank J. Kaiser, Bernd Wollnik, Tim M. Strom, Dagmar Wieczorek

Abstract

Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS) and Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome (NCBRS) are rare intellectual disability/congenital malformation syndromes that represent distinct entities but show considerable clinical overlap. They are caused by mutations in genes encoding members of the BRG1- and BRM-associated factor (BAF) complex. However, there are a number of patients with the clinical diagnosis of CSS or NCBRS in whom the causative mutation has not been identified. In this study, we performed trio-based whole-exome sequencing (WES) in ten previously described but unsolved individuals with the tentative diagnosis of CSS or NCBRS and found causative mutations in nine out of ten individuals. Interestingly, our WES analysis disclosed overlapping differential diagnoses including Wiedemann-Steiner, Kabuki, and Adams-Oliver syndromes. In addition, most likely causative de novo mutations were identified in GRIN2A and SHANK3. Moreover, trio-based WES detected SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 deletions, which had not been annotated in a previous Haloplex target enrichment and next-generation sequencing of known CSS/NCBRS genes emphasizing the advantages of WES as a diagnostic tool. In summary, we discuss the phenotypic and diagnostic challenges in clinical genetics, establish important differential diagnoses, and emphasize the cardinal features and the broad clinical spectrum of BAF complex disorders and other disorders caused by mutations in epigenetic landscapers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,211,265
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#898
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,020
of 255,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.