↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of administrative data for the identification of Parkinson’s disease cohorts

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Reliability of administrative data for the identification of Parkinson’s disease cohorts
Published in
Neurological Sciences, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10072-015-2062-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filippo Baldacci, Laura Policardo, Simone Rossi, Monica Ulivelli, Silvia Ramat, Enrico Grassi, Pasquale Palumbo, Fabio Giovannelli, Massimo Cincotta, Roberto Ceravolo, Sandro Sorbi, Paolo Francesconi, Ubaldo Bonuccelli

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major worldwide public health problem with a prevalence that is expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades. Because administrative data are useful for epidemiologic and health service studies, we aimed to define procedural algorithms to identify PD patients (on a regional basis) using these data. We built two a priori algorithms, respecting privacy laws, with increasing theoretical specificity for PD including: (1) a hospital discharge diagnosis of PD; (2) PD-specific exemption; (3) a minimum of two separate prescriptions of an antiparkinsonian drug. The two algorithms differed for drugs included. Sensitivities were tested on an opportunistic sample of 319 PD patients from the databases of 5 regional movement disorders clinics. The estimated prevalence of PD in the sample population from Tuscany was 0.49 % for algorithm 1 and 0.28 % for algorithm 2. Algorithm 1 correctly identified 291 PD patients (sensitivity 91.2 %), and algorithm 2 identified 242 PD patients (sensitivity 75.9 %). We developed two reproducible algorithms demonstrating increasing theoretical specificity with good sensitivity in identifying PD patients based on an evaluation of administrative data. This may represent a low-cost strategy to reliably follow up a large number of PD patients as a whole for evaluating the effects of therapies, disease progression and prevalence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 18 38%