| Title |
Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-015-9670-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Y. Wagner, Ileana Negulescu, Miriam Schöfthaler, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Agnes S. Meidert, Wolfgang Huber, Roland M. Schmid, Bernd Saugel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,263,155
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#565
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,374
of 256,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.