↓ Skip to main content

Enzalutamide: A Review of Its Use in Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Enzalutamide: A Review of Its Use in Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Published in
Drugs & Aging, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40266-015-0248-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian M. Keating

Abstract

Enzalutamide (Xtandi(®)) is an androgen receptor inhibitor that blocks several steps in the androgen receptor signalling pathway. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties. In the randomized, double-blind, multinational PREVAIL trial, enzalutamide significantly improved both radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival versus placebo in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic CRPC who were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. In addition, enzalutamide significantly delayed the need for chemotherapy and the decline in health-related quality of life versus placebo. Enzalutamide was generally well tolerated in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic CRPC. In conclusion, enzalutamide is a convenient, effective and well tolerated treatment for chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic CRPC who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Computer Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,922,550
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#472
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,879
of 255,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.