| Title |
The Adaptive Function of Distributed Remembering: Contributions to the Formation of Collective Memory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13164-012-0127-y |
| Authors |
Martin M. Fagin, Jeremy K. Yamashiro, William C. Hirst |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 36% |
| Philosophy | 7 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,272,956
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#85
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,911
of 285,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.