| Title |
Bone quality in osteopenic postmenopausal women is not improved after 12 months of whole-body vibration training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-014-2995-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. M. Liphardt, J. Schipilow, D. A. Hanley, S. K. Boyd |
| Abstract |
Whole-body vibration training may improve bone quality through structural adaptation. We tested if 12 months of training affects bone structure in osteopenic postmenopausal women by using advanced 3-dimensional high-resolution imaging techniques. We found that whole-body vibration training did not improve bone structure compared to inactive controls. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 50 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,325,572
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,348
of 3,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,746
of 352,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#36
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.