↓ Skip to main content

Testing the sensitivity and specificity of the fluorescence microscope (Cyscope®) for malaria diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Testing the sensitivity and specificity of the fluorescence microscope (Cyscope®) for malaria diagnosis
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saad El-Din H Hassan, Somia I Okoued, Mahmoud A Mudathir, Elfatih M Malik

Abstract

Early diagnosis and treatment of malaria are necessary components in the control of malaria. The gold standard light microscopy technique has high sensitivity, but is a relatively time-consuming procedure especially during epidemics and in areas of high endemicity. This study attempted to test the sensitivity and specificity of a new diagnostic tool - the Cyscope fluorescence microscope, which is based on the use of Plasmodium nucleic acid-specific fluorescent dyes to facilitate detection of the parasites even in low parasitaemia conditions due to the contrast with the background.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 57 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Engineering 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,325,572
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,471
of 5,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,888
of 95,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#29
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.