↓ Skip to main content

Wound induced defences in plants and their consequences for patterns of insect grazing

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Wound induced defences in plants and their consequences for patterns of insect grazing
Published in
Oecologia, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf00388079
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. J. Edwards, S. D. Wratten

Abstract

Three scales of wound-induced chemical responses in plants are identified: (1) highly localised chemical changes associated with disruption of cell compartmentation; (2) changes induced in cells surrounding the damaged area, forming a kind of halo around the damage, and (3) more widely-dispersed changes which may affect an entire organ, branch or plant. A brief review of the literature reveals that such chemical responses are very widespread in plants, and many of the substances formed are known to affect adversely the growth, development, or reproduction of insects. It is argued that wound-induced changes in plant chemistry represent for insects a powerful selective pressure for the dispersal of grazing. Levels and patterns of invertebrate grazing in a range of herbaceous and deciduous woody plants sampled at the end of the growing seasons were examined. Leaves of many species exhibited a strikingly evident over-dispersion of grazing initiations, and in some cases the arrangement of holes appeared close to regularity. The pattern of damage between leaves was, in most cases, heavily biased towards a large proportion of leaves receiving a low level of grazing. These highly dispersed patterns of grazing damage are consistent with the hypothesis that wound-induced responses play an important role in determining patterns of insect feeding. They have important implications for the expected levels of insect exploitation of host plants and for the advantages to the plant of distributing grazing damage evenly through the canopy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 65 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 54%
Environmental Science 12 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,881,195
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,245
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,941
of 60,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.