| Title |
Effects of different types of damage on the chemistry of birch foliage, and the responses of birch feeding insects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, December 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00378941 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. E. Hartley, J. H. Lawton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 28% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 72% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,331
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,037
of 49,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.