| Title |
Rapid wound-induced resistance in white birch (Betula pubescens) foliage to the geometrid Epirrita autumnata: a comparison of trees and moths within and outside the outbreak range of the moth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00379221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erkki Haukioja, Sinikka Hanhimäki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,782,800
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#759
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,187
of 38,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.