↓ Skip to main content

Hand‐held health records: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hand‐held health records: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/jir.12104
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Nguyen, N. Lennox, R. Ware

Abstract

Hand-held health records (HHHRs) aim to empower individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and improve the communication between all those involved in their health care. HHHRs can be used to identify additional health needs and contribute to improved treatment for individuals with ID. This review summarises evidence concerning the use of HHHRs with individuals with ID.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Psychology 7 10%
Computer Science 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,476,229
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#453
of 1,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,536
of 318,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.