| Title |
Posture and micturition: does it really matter how a woman sits on the toilet?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-013-2284-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ajay Rane, Jay Iyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 23% |
| Engineering | 5 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 15% |
| Design | 2 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,198,116
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#198
of 2,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,179
of 322,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.