↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a diabetes screening program on a rural Chinese population: a 3-year follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Impact of a diabetes screening program on a rural Chinese population: a 3-year follow-up study
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1570-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanlei Zhang, Feng Ning, Jianping Sun, Zengchang Pang, Xiaoyong Wang, Anil Kapur, Harri Sintonen, Qing Qiao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,325,572
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,332
of 14,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,390
of 255,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#194
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.