↓ Skip to main content

A smartphone application supporting patients with psoriasis improves adherence to topical treatment: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A smartphone application supporting patients with psoriasis improves adherence to topical treatment: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, July 2018
DOI 10.1111/bjd.16667
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.T. Svendsen, F. Andersen, K.H. Andersen, A. Pottegård, H. Johannessen, S. Möller, B. August, S.R. Feldman, K.E. Andersen

Abstract

Adherence to topical psoriasis treatments is low which leads to unsatisfactory treatment results. Smartphone applications (apps) for patient support exist, but their potential to improve adherence has not been systematically evaluated. To evaluate whether a study-specific app improves adherence and reduces psoriasis symptoms compared to standard treatment. We conducted a randomized controlled trial. Patients received once-daily medication (calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) cutaneous foam) and were randomized to no app (n = 66) or app intervention (n=68) groups. 122 patients (91%) completed the 22-week follow-up. Adherence was defined as medication applied ≥ 80% of days during the treatment period and assessed by a chip integrated into the medication dispenser. Psoriasis severity was measured by the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA), and quality of life was measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scales at all visits. Intention to treat analyses using regression was performed. more patients in the intervention group were adherent to Cal/BD cutaneous foam compared to patients in the non-intervention group at week four (65% vs. 38%, P = 0.004). the intervention group showed a greater LS-PGA reduction compared to the non-intervention group at week 4 (mean 1.86 vs. 1.46, P = 0.047). A similar effect was seen at weeks 8 and 26, though it did not reach statistical significance. This RCT demonstrates that the app improved short term adherence to Cal/BD cutaneous foam treatment and psoriasis severity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 45 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 9%
Psychology 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 48 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,669,863
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#504
of 9,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,538
of 340,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#9
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.