| Title |
Defining Decision Making: A Qualitative Study of International Experts’ Views on Surgical Trainee Decision Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-011-1089-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah C. Rennie, Andre M. van Rij, Chrystal Jaye, Katherine H. Hall |
| Abstract |
Decision making is a key competency of surgeons; however, how best to assess decisions and decision makers is not clearly established. The aim of the present study was to identify criteria that inform judgments about surgical trainees' decision-making skills. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 35% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,452
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,230
of 108,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.